A settlement being discussed in an antitrust lawsuit against the NCAA and major college conferences could cost billions and pave the way for a compensation model for college athletes.
An agreement has not been finalized and many questions remain unanswered. It is also unclear if new rules could withstand further legal scrutiny, but it appears college sports is heading down a revolutionary path with at least some schools directly paying athletes to participate. Here’s what is known and what still needs to be figured out:
House vs. NCAA is a class-action federal lawsuit seeking damages for athletes who were denied the opportunity to earn money from use of their name, image or likeness going back to 2016. The plaintiffs, including former Arizona State swimmer Grant House, are also asking the court to rule that NIL compensation should include billions of dollars in media rights fees that go to the NCAA and the wealthiest conferences (Big Ten, Big 12, Atlantic Coast and Southeastern), mostly for football and basketball.
Related articles:
Related suggestion:
Kim Kardashian shows off her curves and continues to plug controversial $60k CybertruckNational 3New US sanctions against Russia target weapons development, ban uranium imports for nuclear powerRoss Stripling earns his first win since 2022 as Athletics blank Pirates 4United States defender Sergiño Dest will miss the Copa America. He needs surgery for torn ACLUSC and UCLA to play two men's basketball games apiece at Big Ten's easternmost schoolsRosalia layers an ivory moto jacket over a white maxi dress as she steps out solo in New York City26 Republican attorneys general sue to block Biden rule requiring background checks at gun showsTwins center fielder Byron Buxton leaves game against White Sox with sore right kneeRoss Stripling earns his first win since 2022 as Athletics blank Pirates 4
0.2015s , 6575.1328125 kb
Copyright © 2024 Powered by Paying college athletes appears closer than ever. How could it work and what stands in the way? ,Earthly Essence news portal